Real estate regulation will induce three major risk-cancam

The real estate regulation will induce three rough risk the sina finance opinion leader column (WeChat public kopleader) columnist Chen Jianqi, the current real estate prices soared again prompted the local government to re take the purchase, credit limit and other regulatory path, but in a short period of time many areas of competition regulation overweight, this brutal regulation not only is not conducive to the healthy development of the real estate, may also induce greater risk. The real estate regulation will induce three violent period risk National Day multiple city national intensive introduction of real estate policies, some policy known as "the history of the most stringent" title to real estate, the "golden nine silver ten" is expected to occur prior to differentiation, some real estate experts bullish forecast prices may start to. Some experts believe that the real estate regulation is a rising trend, some people think that the real estate regulation will be positive for non regulatory regions, these regions push prices into growth cycle, especially to help real estate inventory pressure area to inventory. Although the real estate market trend point of view has its specific logic, but the evolution observed since 2008 to the purchase of credit limit, as the core of the real estate administrative regulation policy, can be found in the related policy did not achieve the control objectives, but in recent years many city gradually abandoned the relevant administrative means that effective measures of restriction the credit limit and other real estate regulatory policy is not to promote the healthy development of the real estate market, the government should learn from the experience of the world gradually into real estate tax. However, the current real estate prices soaring again prompted the local government to re take the purchase, credit limit and other regulatory path, but in a short period of competition in many areas to control overweight, regulation of this rough is not only conducive to the healthy development of the real estate, may also induce greater risk. The real estate regulation may be roughly pierce the real estate bubble caused by systemic risk has commented that the purchase, credit limit and other real estate administrative regulation policies help to curb housing prices, it is difficult to support in theory. If the government takes control of the behavior of extreme limit, the needs of buyers, especially in the first and second tier hot city high prices in the background, just to be difficult to have the strength to purchase, such as the prohibition of housing have families to purchase housing policy, at the same time through the marriage agreement and other loopholes, so the real estate market supply and demand to reverse the inevitable, the price adjustment is inevitable. However, falling house prices is the government’s goal? Real estate investment goods, people do not buy or buy up the psychological, if real estate prices, then the real estate market expected investment returns may come down, to enter the real estate funds will face the problem of shrinkage, thus will lead to real estate prices fell under the unilateral pattern, caused by the adjustment of the real estate market the risk of commercial banks, land finance risk will be gradually exposed, the real estate adjustment not only bring downward pressure on the economy, but also increase the financial system risk. As a result, the government’s regulation of housing prices is more limited to curb the momentum of rapid growth rather than to bring it down. To promote the real estate market does not appear sharp decline in the situation, the continuity of macroeconomic policy is particularly critical. But the current local government intensive competition相关的主题文章: